The most cited article by those who have most cruelly spread the worst lies about the alleged victims of the most reported professor, and those who have helped them, has not received any scientific citations, however.
During the period of complaints against the Sociology professor JdM, amid the offensive against the alleged victims and the research center CREA for being the only one to support them, an other professor (Enguita) published the article “From Information to Knowledge, but Seriously.” This piece aims to discredit the only social sciences and humanities research that the European Commission had included in its list of ten successful scientific studies, which was directed by CREA: Included.
The pseudoscientific content is present throughout the article, for example, it states: “I would say that ‘scientific evidence’ dazzles those who have little to do with science.” Contrary to his claim, few things define us as scientists as much as the pursuit of evidence, and few things define pseudoscientists as much as their rejection of it. This attitude is not surprising in a senior professor who was often presented as the number one in the sociology of education and who is now seen to have only 17 citations in the Web of Science, all from articles in two Spanish journals. Not only do senior professors, but also junior researchers, have many more citations and a much higher scientific level. In the research he criticizes, the director has 1,630 citations, and some of his students already have more than 100 when they present their doctoral theses.
Coordinadora del Metoo University